What Is the 1% Rule in Real Estate? Realistic Guide & Alternatives
Top blog articles
The 1% rule in real estate investing is a quick-screening tool many investors use. It states that a property’s gross monthly rent should be at least 1% of its purchase price, including repairs, to provide a buffer for expenses and positive cash flow. This rule helps filter out lower-potential investment properties at a glance.
How to Calculate the 1% Rule
- Determine the total investment cost, including purchase price and any rehab or repair expenses.
- Multiply that total by 0.01 (1%).
For example, if the total cost is $160,000, the minimum rent should be $1,600/month.
When Is the 1% Rule Useful?
- Fast deal screening: eliminate weak cash flow prospects early in the process.
- Helps set expectations for rent relative to price.
- Still viable in mid-tier or cash-flow-friendly markets, especially with current interest rates and cap rates.
Limitations: Why the 1% Rule May Not Work Today
- Housing values outpace rents in high-cost areas, making it nearly impossible to meet the 1% threshold.
- Ignores other critical costs, taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, property management, mortgage interest, etc.
- Market variance, luxury or coastal markets often don’t support the 1% benchmark.
“I haven’t seen 1% in my market in over 10 years…” Reddit commentator summarizing real-world investor sentiment.
Alternatives & Complementary Metrics
- 2% Rule: Requires rent to equal at least 2% of purchase price, suitable for budget-friendly markets.
- Gross Rent Multiplier (GRM): Purchase price divided by annual rent, lower is better.
- Net Operating Income (NOI) & Cap Rate: Profit after expenses, divided by property price for yield metrics.
- Total ROI: Includes rent, appreciation, equity paydown, and tax benefits.
Market Realities: High-Cost vs. Lower-Cost Regions
Market Type | 1% Rule Feasible? | Cash Flow Strategy |
---|---|---|
Urban / Coastal | Rarely meets 1% rule | Focus on appreciation and long-term ROI |
Midwest / South | Often meets 1% rule | Rent-focused cash flow investments |
Multifamily Assets | Higher potential for 1% | Bulk rents & economies of scale |
In regions like San Francisco, a $1 M home would need $10,000/month rent to hit 1%, yet typical rents hover around $3,500.
Example: Does This Pass the 1% Test?

- Purchase & Rehab Costs: $150,000 + $10,000 = $160,000
- 1% Rule Threshold: 1% × $160,000 = $1,600/month required rent
- If rent is $1,600 or more → property meets 1% rule.
- If rent is $1,200 → does not meet 1% rule and may struggle to cash flow.
When You Might Still Choose a Below-1% Property
- In a market with strong appreciation, long-term gain can outweigh short-term rent metrics.
- Tax benefits, amortization, and leverage may offset lower cash flow temporarily.
- High-demand areas may command strong tenant demand and future rent increases.
FAQs
Q: Is the 1% rule realistic today?
A: It’s useful in select markets, but not universal, particularly difficult in expensive cities.
Q: Should I use the 1% or 2% rule?
A: Use 2% in lower-cost, cash-forward markets; 1% in moderate markets. Neither works well in high-priced areas.
Q: Does 1% rent guarantee profit?
A: No, it provides a baseline, but other costs and financing significantly impact net cash flow.
Bottom Line
The 1% rule in real estate can be a helpful starting point to assess whether a property has rental income potential. However, it must be paired with deeper financial analysis, including operating costs, financing, market trends, and long-term value. Use it as a screening filter, not your only decision tool.
Your opinion matters, leave a comment